"Why India is still developing?" Part I
"India is my country"..we
used to start our school days by reading this pledge. With the same
responsibility i have written this article ,it's my simple analysis and
understanding of Why India is still developing ? Actually , India is
one of among the rich nations around the globe like everyone knows.Even a
10th standard school boy answers for my above question as corruption.
But i tried a revelation in this article lets look into. It was in my
mind from my school days ! believe it or not !!i know i took a hefty
topic to deal with. Am glad that am sharing my views and ideas through
this podium to all you guys. stay patient and read my protracted,precocious article ever i have written.
To begin, I will try to explain from the base i.e. what was exactly happened in before independence and after independence? How people are manipulated?
How many of us agree the famous quote many of us read in our school text books "MG-Father of our na***". Did anyone thought who, why they have written. was that actually true ? How many people are educated wen the freed*movement took place. How many people blindly followed him without any aware of his actual ideologies. Ha ha , How many people are really know the reason behind Anna movement. How many of us knew Anna is wrong? There are many questions ?????????? I would like to present my percept’s in all this and what made India to be in developing but not developed.
How many of us really knew the difference between violence and
non-violence: Defending our selves is not violence it's so called self-defense.
To begin, I will try to explain from the base i.e. what was exactly happened in before independence and after independence? How people are manipulated?
How many of us agree the famous quote many of us read in our school text books "MG-Father of our na***". Did anyone thought who, why they have written. was that actually true ? How many people are educated wen the freed*movement took place. How many people blindly followed him without any aware of his actual ideologies. Ha ha , How many people are really know the reason behind Anna movement. How many of us knew Anna is wrong? There are many questions ?????????? I would like to present my percept’s in all this and what made India to be in developing but not developed.
How many of us really knew the difference between violence and
non-violence: Defending our selves is not violence it's so called self-defense.
After,
the death of Tilak, the famous person on those days after his "satyr***
act"and his saint-ism. He joined in INC mass Indians were manipulated
by the famous leaders and their followers. They kept ignorant all the
time.people are always attracted to him , he captured the media and
press on those days.Everything was a hype.oops !! dontwry am not gonna
explain the whole 1947 era. In zooming,its preposterous in those ideologies or movements.showing other cheek to get slap.
what was he taught was the main blow to the fall of our nation.when everything is washed off . Whats the point in having the barren land with us. where is our treasure or wealth our enormous and rich land. I would rather say its not what we got its what they gave.(what they have thrown)they captured and used every corner of our land.Bhagatsingh, Azad,Netaji,if these people were alive then, we would get our independence with our resources and wealth. How far it is good or at least fare enough to die without gaining a single acre of land. We would get our land with the same amount of sacrifice with our wealth.
The INC for there self development and ever lasting political career , they used every bit of people need.what was MG done is true politics.the one who teaching r preachings of nonviolence,only tortured his wife .how fare it is ?? how many of them knew ??actually. Why ppl like to make movies & quotes on Bhagatsingh,Azad, Netaji many ppl love and like to keep the quotes of revolutionary people marx,lenin,che guevara.why not on MG(it has lot of controversies).Rang de basanti.because those will make us inspire and admiring.There's nothing wrong or conspiracy or controversy in their movement. Where was our MG when saunderers(The Saunders family was a family of important industrialists and politicians in England) hanged Bhagatsingh.why he didn't support Bhagatsingh. (from Wikipedia->"According to the Superintendent of Police at the time, V.N. Smith, the hanging was advanced by a day:Normally execution took place at 8 am, but it was decided to act at once before the public could become aware of what had happened...At about 7 pm shouts of Inquilab Zindabad were heard from inside the jail.This was interpreted, correctly, as a signal that the final curtain was about to drop.
The Jail authorities broke the rear wall of the Jail and secretly cremated the three martyrs under cover of darkness on the banks of Sutlej, about 10 km from Ferozepore")
why MG was silent when this bullshit is happening.(one of his famous saying,he stated that It is easy to kill individuals but you cannot kill the ideas. Great empires crumbled while the ideas survived.
MG was the man responsible for release of 90,000 ppl in Gandhi-Irwin pact.where is our so called Father of the na** wen netaji was disappeared. Its still a enigmatic.why ??every attempt made by netaji went in futile for lack of support. Why there is no action from the govt.Its nothing but a political game, a high voltage drama was happened.he was called spiritual leader too..hm a true leader can't be a spiritual teacher rather i say shouldn't be .just for a political hereditary growth,the govt.made him as father of nation.grandfather-to father-son.a very preplanned for future growth by gand**-pandit n**.History is one-sided. From childhood,they made it in textbook.injected the false stories. Why govt was not at all transparent.why things went furtively.how far govt.supported the true freedom fighters and scholars like tagore,Ashfqulla khan,Bhaga jatin,shyam prasad mukherji,kamraj nadar,lala lajpati rai,lalbahudur shastri.
what he thought and induced in the ppl to recede the British was absurd.why the govt. smother the letters and books of nathuram go*** .how many of us know he is a editor for a famous marathi newspaper "agrani". Why Mr.MG was favor to one sector of ppl.why he wouldn't obliterate caste ism or support the untouchables instead hes against to them in the round table conference were Ambedkar was pro to them and won.if hes father of nat**.hes father to everyone or father of a section of nation.(social progress depends not upon the ennoblement of the few but on the enrichment of democracy; universal brotherhood can be achieved only when there is an equality of opportunity - of opportunity in the social, political and individual life." — from Bhagat Singh's prison diary, ). If there is no untouchability and equal opportunity on those days. Many of people would be economical satisfied and there wont be a scope of reservations too. As they were economically,socially and personally deprived and made them downtrodden even more. why to impoverish a sector or set of community? what would be the position or status of debilitate section of people if Ambedkar wouldn't be on their side.
were was our father of nat**.when people are not allowed to drink water. I wouldn't go in depth as the issues are emotive and though our country is democratic for namesake.
so, i would summarize this part as first of all , MG was wrong ,now suddenly, how senseless people calling 2nd gand** , a lurid news all over in India.how people are accepting Anna's method to fight against corruption and the same blunder nonviolence. Is suicide, is not crime ??? was dat not political blackmail. Once the Constitution came into force, we should avoid all non-constitutional methods like protests and satyagraha, for they are the grammar of anarchy. If two persons go on fasts until death for two opposing reasons, we cannot decide the issue by allowing one person to die first.
what was he taught was the main blow to the fall of our nation.when everything is washed off . Whats the point in having the barren land with us. where is our treasure or wealth our enormous and rich land. I would rather say its not what we got its what they gave.(what they have thrown)they captured and used every corner of our land.Bhagatsingh, Azad,Netaji,if these people were alive then, we would get our independence with our resources and wealth. How far it is good or at least fare enough to die without gaining a single acre of land. We would get our land with the same amount of sacrifice with our wealth.
The INC for there self development and ever lasting political career , they used every bit of people need.what was MG done is true politics.the one who teaching r preachings of nonviolence,only tortured his wife .how fare it is ?? how many of them knew ??actually. Why ppl like to make movies & quotes on Bhagatsingh,Azad, Netaji many ppl love and like to keep the quotes of revolutionary people marx,lenin,che guevara.why not on MG(it has lot of controversies).Rang de basanti.because those will make us inspire and admiring.There's nothing wrong or conspiracy or controversy in their movement. Where was our MG when saunderers(The Saunders family was a family of important industrialists and politicians in England) hanged Bhagatsingh.why he didn't support Bhagatsingh. (from Wikipedia->"According to the Superintendent of Police at the time, V.N. Smith, the hanging was advanced by a day:Normally execution took place at 8 am, but it was decided to act at once before the public could become aware of what had happened...At about 7 pm shouts of Inquilab Zindabad were heard from inside the jail.This was interpreted, correctly, as a signal that the final curtain was about to drop.
The Jail authorities broke the rear wall of the Jail and secretly cremated the three martyrs under cover of darkness on the banks of Sutlej, about 10 km from Ferozepore")
why MG was silent when this bullshit is happening.(one of his famous saying,he stated that It is easy to kill individuals but you cannot kill the ideas. Great empires crumbled while the ideas survived.
MG was the man responsible for release of 90,000 ppl in Gandhi-Irwin pact.where is our so called Father of the na** wen netaji was disappeared. Its still a enigmatic.why ??every attempt made by netaji went in futile for lack of support. Why there is no action from the govt.Its nothing but a political game, a high voltage drama was happened.he was called spiritual leader too..hm a true leader can't be a spiritual teacher rather i say shouldn't be .just for a political hereditary growth,the govt.made him as father of nation.grandfather-to father-son.a very preplanned for future growth by gand**-pandit n**.History is one-sided. From childhood,they made it in textbook.injected the false stories. Why govt was not at all transparent.why things went furtively.how far govt.supported the true freedom fighters and scholars like tagore,Ashfqulla khan,Bhaga jatin,shyam prasad mukherji,kamraj nadar,lala lajpati rai,lalbahudur shastri.
what he thought and induced in the ppl to recede the British was absurd.why the govt. smother the letters and books of nathuram go*** .how many of us know he is a editor for a famous marathi newspaper "agrani". Why Mr.MG was favor to one sector of ppl.why he wouldn't obliterate caste ism or support the untouchables instead hes against to them in the round table conference were Ambedkar was pro to them and won.if hes father of nat**.hes father to everyone or father of a section of nation.(social progress depends not upon the ennoblement of the few but on the enrichment of democracy; universal brotherhood can be achieved only when there is an equality of opportunity - of opportunity in the social, political and individual life." — from Bhagat Singh's prison diary, ). If there is no untouchability and equal opportunity on those days. Many of people would be economical satisfied and there wont be a scope of reservations too. As they were economically,socially and personally deprived and made them downtrodden even more. why to impoverish a sector or set of community? what would be the position or status of debilitate section of people if Ambedkar wouldn't be on their side.
were was our father of nat**.when people are not allowed to drink water. I wouldn't go in depth as the issues are emotive and though our country is democratic for namesake.
so, i would summarize this part as first of all , MG was wrong ,now suddenly, how senseless people calling 2nd gand** , a lurid news all over in India.how people are accepting Anna's method to fight against corruption and the same blunder nonviolence. Is suicide, is not crime ??? was dat not political blackmail. Once the Constitution came into force, we should avoid all non-constitutional methods like protests and satyagraha, for they are the grammar of anarchy. If two persons go on fasts until death for two opposing reasons, we cannot decide the issue by allowing one person to die first.
http://avi-mypercept.blogspot.com/2012/01/why-india-is-still-developing-part-ii.html
Comments
Post a Comment